--- description: Learn how TestMu AI can help your business. We provide UK business users the most detailed information on pricing, features, usability, and reviews for TestMu AI. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: TestMu AI Reviews, Prices & Ratings | GetApp UK 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Automation Testing Tools](/directory/389/testing/software) > [TestMu AI](/software/111387/lambdatest) # TestMu AI Canonical: https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/111387/lambdatest Page: 1 / 23\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/111387/lambdatest?page=2) > TestMu AI is the Native AI-Agentic Cloud Platform to Supercharge Quality Engineering. Test intelligently and ship faster. > > Verdict: Rated **4.6/5** by 547 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Overview ### Key benefits of TestMu AI Selenium Web Testing Automation Selenium Grid For Mobile Web-Automation Testing Live Interactive Browser Compatibility Testing Faster Automated Screenshot Testing Scroll Sync to test two devices simultaneously using LT browser app Parallel Testing For Faster Goto Market Launch API For Continuous Testing Continuous Testing with Continuous Integration tools KaneAI — GenAI-native test authoring in natural language Kane CLI — terminal-native AI browser testing HyperExecute — test orchestration up to 70% faster AI-native visual testing with SmartUI ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.6/5** | 547 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.4/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.6/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: LambdaTest - **Location**: San Francisco, US - **Founded**: 2017 ## Commercial Context - **Starting Price**: US$19.00 - **Pricing model**: Per User (Free version available) (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: TestMu AI (formerly LambdaTest) — Pricing Overview KaneAI (GenAI-native testing agent): • Free: 2 KaneAI authoring agents, 14-day trial • Kane AI (Web): $249/month per agent • Kane AI (Mobile + Web): $349/month per agent • Enterprise: Custom (contact sales) Kane CLI (terminal-native AI testing, credit-based): • Free: $0 — 200 credits/month • Starter: $19/month ($15/month billed annually) — 2,000 credits/month • Pro: $99/month — 10,000 credits/month, HyperExecute remote execution • Enterprise: Custom Live (Real-Time Testing): • Free for 1 parallel test • $19/month (monthly) or $15/month (annually) for 1 parallel test, increasing per parallel test up to $475/month (monthly) or $175/month (annually) for 25 parallel tests Real Device Cloud: • $35/month (monthly) or $25/month (annually) for 1 parallel test, increasing per parallel test up to $625/month (monthly) or $500/month (annually) for 25 parallel tests Large organizations requiring more than 25 parallel tests or custom needs should contact TestMu AI directly for a custom quote. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Anguilla, Antigua & Barbuda, Aruba, Australia, Austria, Bahamas, Barbados, Belgium, Belize, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Bulgaria, Canada, Cayman Islands, Costa Rica, Cuba, Cyprus, Denmark, Dominica, Dominican Republic and 43 more ## Features - API - Activity Dashboard - Activity Tracking - Agile Methodologies - Alerts/Notifications - Assessment Management - Assignment Management - Audit Trail - Backlog Management - Bug Tracking - Bug/Issue Capture - Collaboration Tools - Configurable Workflow - Cross Browser Testing - Customisable Reports - Customizable Fields - Data Visualisation - Debugging - Issue Management - Mobile Testing ## Integrations (15 total) - Asana - Bitbucket - CircleCI - GitHub - GitLab - Hive - Jira - MantisBT - Microsoft Visual Studio - Paymo - Slack - Teamwork.com - Trello - WordPress - monday.com AI Work Platform ## Support Options - Email/Help Desk - FAQs/Forum - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - 24/7 (Live rep) ## Category - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.co.uk/directory/389/testing/software) ## Related Categories - [Automation Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.co.uk/directory/389/testing/software) - [Bug Tracking Software](https://www.getapp.co.uk/directory/1003/bug-tracking/software) - [Performance Testing Tools](https://www.getapp.co.uk/directory/1299/performance-testing/software) - [Generative AI Tools](https://www.getapp.co.uk/directory/3874/generative-ai/software) ## Alternatives 1. [BrowserStack](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/170655/browserstack) — 4.6/5 (776 reviews) 2. [ACCELQ](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/111257/accelq) — 4.9/5 (146 reviews) 3. [PFLB](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/2078160/pflb) — 5.0/5 (44 reviews) 4. [QA Wolf](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/2047371/qa-wolf) — 5.0/5 (75 reviews) 5. [testomat.io](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/2061099/testomatio) — 4.7/5 (23 reviews) ## Reviews ### "Regression and Cross Browser Testing" — 4.0/5 > **Rodgers** | *12 January 2026* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: I use LambdaTest frequently for both regression and cross browser testing, and it has genuinely simplified my day to day work. Launching different browser and OS combinations is fast, and it’s a big plus that I no longer need to manage a separate device lab or multiple virtual machines. Overall performance is reliable, and running tests in parallel has noticeably reduced our execution time during busy sprint periods. > > **Cons**: The interface, however, can sometimes feel a little busy, particularly when trying to sift through logs or older session records. I’ve also run into a few instances where test sessions were slightly sluggish, which can be annoying when dealing with timing sensitive defects. With smoother navigation and more flexible, configurable reporting screens, it would align even more naturally with my QA workflow. > > Overall performance is reliable, and running tests in parallel has noticeably reduced our execution time during busy sprint periods. I definitely would recommend the tool. ----- ### "A Reliable and Feature-Rich Platform for Cross-Browser Testing" — 4.0/5 > **Anonymous User** | *19 June 2025* | Information Technology & Services | Recommendation rating: 9.0/10 > > **Pros**: LambdaTest has excellent cross-browser testing with good support for browsers and devices along with easy integrations. A few instances of performance hiccups and pricing problems stop this from a flawless 5 stars but otherwise make for a sound and operational platform. > > **Cons**: What I liked most about LambdaTest is its wide range of real browsers and devices, which ensures thorough compatibility testing. The platform is easy to use, and setting up live and automated tests is simple. I also appreciate its strong integration support with tools like GitHub, Jira, Slack, and CI/CD pipelines. Visual regression testing and smart UI testing features are also incredibly helpful for frontend teams. > > Occasionally, sessions take time to load, especially when accessing older browsers or emulated mobile devices. The automated screenshot tool sometimes has rendering inconsistencies, and network throttling settings could offer more flexibility. Also, for startups or small teams, the pricing might feel high unless all advanced features are regularly used. ----- ### "Fake Devices, Real problems with Security Bugs" — 1.0/5 > **Vince** | *28 October 2025* | Computer Software | Recommendation rating: 3.0/10 > > **Pros**: The UI looks modern but Backend is not stable - pretty interface hiding a broken backend. Lambdatest Security bugs are another nightmare I think this is the reason G2 has recently banned them. > > **Cons**: Requested iPhone 14 Pro for testing, got an emulator instead. No warning, no notification. Discovered only when device-specific features failed. This happens 70% of the time. > > Testing our mobile banking app's biometric features. Emulators can't test FaceID or TouchID, making our security testing impossible. ----- ### "No brainer compared to BrowserStack" — 5.0/5 > **Thomas** | *17 February 2025* | Professional Training & Coaching | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Improvements come thick and fast. The support is incredible. It just works :) > > **Cons**: No real issues at all. Would always like things to be cheaper but can't complain as it's competitive. > > Onboarding are great. Sales team aren't annoying like BrowserStack. Would recommend to anyone. ----- ### "Just do it, its worth it." — 5.0/5 > **Shaun** | *27 January 2025* | Marketing & Advertising | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: Its simple to use, has lots of options. the real device testing is so powerful to look into what maybe going on with your web application, without having to have all the devices charged and ready to go. Also their support is great and fast. > > **Cons**: Can't think of one at the moment, I don't use it enough to be honest > > Its been great from day one, simple stuff which just works and great support. ----- Page: 1 / 23\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/111387/lambdatest?page=2) ## Links - [View on GetApp](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/111387/lambdatest) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | de | | | de-AT | | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | es | | | es-CL | | | es-CO | | | es-MX | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | | nl | | | nl-BE | | ----- ## Structured Data