--- description: Learn how RIB SpecLink can help your business. We provide UK business users the most detailed information on pricing, features, usability, and reviews for RIB SpecLink. image: https://gdm-localsites-assets-gfprod.imgix.net/images/getapp/og_logo-94fd2a03a6c7a0e54fc0c9e21a1c0ce9.png title: RIB SpecLink Reviews, Prices & Ratings | GetApp UK 2026 --- Breadcrumb: [Home](/) > [Architecture Design Software](/directory/529/architecture/software) > [RIB SpecLink](/software/2052440/speclink-1) # RIB SpecLink Canonical: https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/2052440/speclink-1 Page: 1 / 6\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/2052440/speclink-1?page=2) > SpecLink is a cloud-based building specification software designed to help businesses improve spec coordination, speed up editing tasks, simplify sustainable design certification, and synchronize specs with various BIM models. The construction specification software lets teams identify and adjust specifications according to changes made in their Revit models, monitor the impact of changes, and coordinate and communicate key design changes throughout the design phase. > > Verdict: Rated **4.5/5** by 118 users. Top-rated for **Likelihood to recommend**. ----- ## Quick Stats & Ratings | Metric | Rating | Detail | | **Overall** | **4.5/5** | 118 Reviews | | Ease of Use | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Customer Support | 4.5/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Value for Money | 4.3/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Features | 4.2/5 | Based on overall reviews | | Recommendation percentage | 90% | (9/10 Likelihood to recommend) | ## About the vendor - **Company**: RIB Software - **Founded**: 1961 ## Commercial Context - **Pricing model**: Flat Rate (Free Trial) - **Pricing Details**: Prices listed are for one concurrent user. - **Target Audience**: Self Employed, 2–10, 11–50, 51–200, 201–500, 501–1,000, 1,001–5,000, 5,001–10,000, 10,000+ - **Deployment & Platforms**: Cloud, SaaS, Web-based - **Supported Languages**: English - **Available Countries**: Bahamas, Bermuda, British Virgin Islands, Canada, Cayman Islands, China, Costa Rica, Cyprus, Czechia, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, India, Ireland and 16 more ## Features - 3D Imaging - BIM Modeling - Bills of Material - Customisable Reports - Customisable Templates - Data Import/Export - Document Management - Document Storage - For AEC Industry - Multiple Projects - Project Management - Project Workflow - Real-Time Notifications - Role-Based Permissions - Scheduling - Template Management - Third-Party Integrations ## Support Options - Knowledge Base - Phone Support - Chat ## Category - [Architecture Design Software](https://www.getapp.co.uk/directory/529/architecture/software) ## Related Categories - [Architecture Design Software](https://www.getapp.co.uk/directory/529/architecture/software) - [Construction Project Management Software](https://www.getapp.co.uk/directory/28/construction-management/software) ## Alternatives 1. [Design Flex](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/2048910/2020-design-live) — 4.3/5 (357 reviews) 2. [AutoCAD](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/112399/autocad) — 4.7/5 (3213 reviews) 3. [Programa](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/2062141/programa) — 4.8/5 (73 reviews) 4. [Revit](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/120355/revit) — 4.6/5 (484 reviews) 5. [ARCHICAD](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/113551/archicad) — 4.4/5 (280 reviews) ## Reviews ### "It Makes Spec Writing 'Fun'." — 5.0/5 > **Rick** | *1 April 2026* | Architecture & Planning | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The ease of use. If you are paying attention, even the most inexperienced person can start writing a specification. I also like the 'road map' you get when you start a Section and it promts you to items you should have in the spec (green), and the items to consider (yellow). > > **Cons**: Occasionally it is hard to add Manufacturers to a Division. I also detest the 'blanks' that show up when you print or save. I know that's on me, but is it possible to have those empty spaces change color (like Red) so it is even easer to spot them? > > Very good. I am very impressed with the program overall, and I recommend other AEC profossionals to give it a serious look if they are looking for Specification Writing software. ----- ### "Pretty good" — 4.0/5 > **Megan** | *1 April 2026* | Architecture & Planning | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Pros**: Increased workload production and project management. Ease of uploading and changing specifications. > > **Cons**: Lack of help, efficient training, and easy answers to questions. Past experiences have taught me that Speclink help doesn't know the product. > > Mostly positive when using the product, however, there are a few too many glitches and time when the software slows down or won't print. Getting intelligent, meaningful help is impossible. ----- ### "Laura's Review" — 3.0/5 > **Laura** | *24 June 2025* | Mechanical or Industrial Engineering | Recommendation rating: 6.0/10 > > **Pros**: It's great to have the ability to bulk format and keep master specs; linking throughout and overall speediness as compared to Speclink-E is a big improvement. > > **Cons**: The header/footer function is a big downgrade from how it was in Speclink-E. Lately there are bugs with the software missing edits, missing choices, causing errors and typos that are not user-error. Tables are also a downgrade from Speclink-E. No ability to bulk print all-text drafts. > > Overall it's good, but every now and then it really lags and I'm constantly needing to refresh the page to try to get it to speed up. As mentioned above, the formatting abilities could really use work to bring it back up to Speclink-E quality and customization. Obviously, Speclink is much better than Word documents or otherwise, but it still causes headaches. ----- ### "Good overall, but still a few bugs." — 4.0/5 > **Stacy** | *1 April 2026* | Architecture & Planning | Recommendation rating: 7.0/10 > > **Pros**: Fairly easy to use and I like the team comment feature. It has worked well for one spec I wrote. A read me function screen for linked team members would be helpful so they know how the program works and they do not need to comment on every line in the spec, even the ones that are not selected. > > **Cons**: Export and Print features are a little rough and importing sections has limitations that are not fully explained, including features that do not work unless the file is "named correctly" but this is not explained. > > Works fairly well. I like the online access, but there is significant lag. This may be due to my personal connection, but downloading the section to work on it should solve this problem. I was clicking on things, and nothing would happen, so I click it again, and it was a problem. It slowed editing significantly. ----- ### "Brew me another cup to top off my morning with SpecLink\!" — 5.0/5 > **Lori Reynolds** | *1 April 2026* | Building Materials | Recommendation rating: 10.0/10 > > **Pros**: The ease at which valued information is literally at our fingertips. Straight-forward, no complicated means by which to obtain this information. Quick and genuinely helpful customer service. Always makes our day\! > > **Cons**: All the "likes" are in my PROS bucket\! I guess it would have to be the harsh reality that with RIB SpecLink we don't have the benefits as with a Project Lead Service, which really would be the icing on the cake\! > > Very positive experience. We have always felt that RIB had OUR interests first. The reporting is super easy and relevant. Makes for a great presentation to our teams. ----- Page: 1 / 6\ Next: [Next page](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/2052440/speclink-1?page=2) ## Links - [View on GetApp](https://www.getapp.co.uk/software/2052440/speclink-1) ## This page is available in the following languages | Locale | URL | | en | | | en-AE | | | en-AU | | | en-CA | | | en-GB | | | en-IE | | | en-NZ | | | en-SG | | | en-ZA | | | fr | | | fr-BE | | | fr-CA | | ----- ## Structured Data